Systems of Systems & IntegrationAnnual Plan
Autonomously Learning Mobility Limits
Principal InvestigatorIlya Kolmanovsky, University of Michigan Anouck Girard, University of Michigan
Denise Rizzo, Ian Stranaly, U.S. Army GVSC
Ken Butts, Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. (TEMA)
Kaiwen Liu, Nan Li, Manuel Lanchares-Prieto, University of Michigan
Projected started in 2018 and is ongoing.
As powertrain systems and ground vehicles operate in uncertain environment and are subject to manufacturing variability, aging, degradation and damage in adversarial scenarios, the constraint boundaries can often be uncertain and maneuvers that can cause constraint violation, i.e., violations of thermal, power, and traction limits, may be a priori unknown. A common practice is then to operate these systems and vehicles conservatively to avoid constraint violation in the worst case “tolerance stack up” scenario. Such conservative operation ensures safety but can severely limit vehicle performance and mobility.
A novel, emerging approach to address the above performance-robustness tradeoff is to integrate prediction and learning/adaptation. In non-safety critical cases, where occasional constraint violation is undesirable but does not lead to catastrophic consequences, such systems may initially operate with constraint violations and learn over time to avoid them by less aggressive maneuvering. In safety critical cases, in which constraint violation is not permitted during learning, such systems will initially operate conservatively, and then improve their performance as they learn more about constraint boundaries and maneuvers that approach closely the constraint boundary. In military applications, by integrating prediction and learning/adaptation, mission feasibility and completion time can be positively impacted.
This research project develops and demonstrates novel algorithms and supporting theory for autonomously learning to operate powertrain systems and ground vehicles safely and non-conservatively. Safety refers to the operation without violation of critical limits (imposed as pointwise-in-time state and control constraints), while non-conservatism refers to the ability to follow specified commands (set-points, way-points, etc.) fast and with small tracking errors thereby achieving high performance.
K. Liu, N. Li, D. Rizzo, E. Garone, I. Kolmanovsky, and A. Girard, “Model-free learning to avoid constraint violations: An explicit reference governor approach,” 2019 American Control Conference, pp. 934-940, 2019.
“Learning–based Reference Governors to Satisfy Critical Constraints in Uncertain Environments,” presentation in Modeling and Simulation of Military Ground Vehicles session at SAE World Congress, April 11, 2019.
M. Lanchares-Prieto, I. Kolmanovsky, A. Girard, and D. Rizzo “Reference governors based on online learning of maximal output admissible set,” 2019 Dynamic Systems and Control Conference, Paper DSCC2019-8950, pp. 1-10.
K. Liu, N. Li, I. Kolmanovsky, D. Rizzo, and A. Girard, “Model-free learning for safety-critical control systems: A reference governor approach,” 2020 American Control Conference, submitted and under review.